🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a ban on sending national guard in Portland, Oregon, following a latest legal decision.

Appeals Court Concurs to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on this week that it would rehear the legal dispute concerning the executive power with an larger group of eleven justices. The court also vacated a earlier decision from a three-judge panel that had supported the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This legal directive represents the latest development in a long-running court case over whether the former president has the authority and valid reason to deploy national guard forces in Portland. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in limbo since the end of September when the deployment effort was initiated in due to ongoing demonstrations.

Differing Viewpoints

The federal government has argued that government employees at the ICE facility in the southern part of the city were under attack, while city and state officials maintain that municipal police have control of the situation.

In defiance of descriptions of Portland as “war ravaged”, residents have been posting footage of lush hiking trails and a thriving food scene, and organizing events such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the increased military presence.

Recent Legal Actions

The Tuesday ruling came after a US district judge in the city enacted two temporary restraining orders this period – one preventing the federalization of the Oregon national guard, and another prohibiting the use of any national guard troops in the state, after efforts to circumvent the first order by mobilizing out-of-state forces.

On Monday, the ninth circuit panel had put the first ruling on hold – permitting control of 200 Oregon national guard – but the second ruling remained in place, blocking the physical sending of the forces.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard by the full court – with all decisions under consideration together – by a panel of 11 judges.

“This ruling shows that the truth matters and that the judicial system are striving to hold this administration accountable. The constitution restricts the president’s power, and local populations cannot be treated as a testing site for unchecked federal authority,” said the legal representative in a statement.

“The court is sending a definite signal: the executive leader cannot dispatch the military into American urban areas without cause. We will continue defending state legislation, values, and autonomy as this legal proceeding moves forward and our fight continues in the courts.”